Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Read the Judge then the Law.




Law schools teach us how to read the law. Court rooms teach us how to read the judge. In theory this is called as behavioral school of jurisprudence. Read the judge then the law. This legal realism is the most important teaching which almost all of us missed while getting bored with the lectures of jurisprudence. Reading the judge is the most important part of law practice. 

Hitherto, law courts are presided over by human beings and like any other human made system, courts are very much dependent on the mindset and behavior of the person sitting in the chair. Impersonal interpretation of law is a utopia. Law schools taught us that the law is universal but in practice it is based on individual judges' interpretation. Our legal system works on ‘court to court basis’.  

Judicial interpretation has no fundamental rules (barring few principles of statutory interpretation). It is largely based on behavioral aspect of the judges. As it is said there is no absolute philosopher. Every philosopher is the product of his own circumstances. It is true with the judges too. There is no absolute definition of judicial behavior except an old English grammar lesson in comparisons, which says “as sober as a judge”. Every judge is the product of his own learning of law and the life.

Indian constitutional scheme vests the judges in higher courts with unfettered discretion. Except self-restraint, system does not provide many checks to balance the power of judges. Discretionary remedy to the judges  was provided by the constitutional framers against the violative power of the state to safeguard people. Power either of state or exercised by the judges on behalf of the state has a natural tendency of encroachment.


‘Self-restraint’ of judges in law courts is a failing idea at best.

“Therefore, I said, the judge should not be young; he should have learned to know evil, not from his own soul, but from late and long observation of the nature of evil in others: knowledge should be his guide, not personal experience.”
                           -Plato, The Republic, Book III.
Kartikey



16 comments:

Santosh Mamgain said...

Excellent

Unknown said...

Really nice... Tahts what my mother taught me ....she used to say sit in the court I. Your free time and read the Judge.... You will know in na hour how to present your case before him...

Shalini Agrawal said...

Good insight..... Now i know why facts doesn't wkbat times. Hmmm

Jurisblogis said...

Good lesson.
Profile is unknown...!

Unknown said...

The old saw that laws have flaws emanates from the fundamental fact that laws are after all made by humans and that they are susceptible to distortion or subversion in interpretation if the judge makes them so. That is the reason it takes protracted spell of sustained practice at the bar in getting the grasp of the underlying connotations of jurisprudence so that those who later on sit on the benches to deliver judgment do evince a balance of mind that is free from prejudice or personal fancies. Kudos to Mr. Gupta in highlighting this salient point in the legal profession to make us realize that it is incumbent upon the higher echelons in the pantheon to be free from prejudice or personal biases that might cloud their thinking into delivering not a fair verdict.

Kapil Dixit and Co., Advocates, Bangalore said...

Excellent Article Mr Kartikey.

Jurisblogis said...

Thanks sir

Jurisblogis said...

Thanks Kapil Bhai

Saurabh said...

This is called experience. Reading somebody’s way of thinking helps to crack most complicated issues in professional as well as personal life.Nice analysis!

D.K. JOSHI said...

very true

Harpreet Singh sandhu said...

As sober as judge , I think this phrase is as utopian as justice everywhere . The concept of saying and seeing 'getting elevation' is not just getting elevated to the bench ,the person need to get elevated in mind also .

Ashish Dahiya said...

Practical approach for better presentation of any case....

Unknown said...

Very interesting ..

Sharad said...

Absolutely correct

Maneesh said...

Precise

Subhash Gupta said...

This is reality. This shows in dissenting judgments.
Prof. Subhash Chandra Gupta